Home > Uncategorized > Understanding disk IOPS

Understanding disk IOPS

You surely have already seen those figures, a 15K disk does +/- 210 IOPS whilst SATA disk can barely achieve 30-40 IOPS.

How do they do to determine disks IOPS?

It is far from obvious and you must refer to the technical details provided by the disk manufacturer and use a simple formula given below.  Also this is the theory, no file system, no data, no OS, this is raw disk power right off the pipe. Now let’s have a look at the formula:

1/(average latency in ms + average seek time for read or write in ms)

 

This is the specifications of a Seagate Cheetah 300GB 15K disk and actually have a look at the latency and seek times, that’s what we need for the formula.

SeagateCheetah300GB15K

So for this particular disk, theoretically the maximum we can expect is 1/(.0022)=454IOPS
And for the minimum, that I would call the best of the worst case, we can expect 1/(.006)=166IOPS
That gives us an average of 310IOPS! Not bad for the latest of Seagate’s high end disks family.

Now that you have the formula, go and check your own disk max/min/average IOPS and post it here ;)

Also read my other post on IOPS where I give the formula to calcuate the IOPS you can expect of a virtual environment.

Advertisement
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Tony
    September 14, 2009 at 05:02 | #1

    Hi,

    A valiant attempt to determine IOPs, but wrong … talking theoretical maximum is pointless. In theory one could get into an IO loop reading onlydata from a single track thus eliminating track seek times and the measured performance gets event better.

    In reality one must take the Average Seek time to get a real feel for the maximum performnce of a disk in th ereal world.

    Workloads are being condensed onto a smaller footprint and thus there is more contention and thus all IO tends to be random so the average response is the measure.

    So for real world plannng using the 166 IOPs when sizing solutions … 310 IOPs – thats a pipe dream …

    Tony

  2. deinoscloud
    September 14, 2009 at 10:14 | #2

    You are absolutely right Tony… This is theoretically the maximum speed you could get, as stated, raw power. In real world, this is another story and a subject for another article, stay tunned ;)

  3. Ahmed
    October 15, 2009 at 16:29 | #3

    How are you getting the 0.0022 number when calculating the first IOPS of 454? I add average latency and average seek read time, and get a 5.5.

  4. deinoscloud
    October 15, 2009 at 17:41 | #4

    Hi Ahmed. Average Latency (2ms or .002s) + Seek Time Track-to-Track Read (0.2ms or .0002s) = 2.2ms or .0022s

    IOPS are per second (s), and often disk time and latency specifications are in miliseconds (ms) which is 1/1,000 of a second (s).

    I hope it clarifies the formula…

    Cheers,
    Didier

    N.B. Look at this link http://unit-converter.org/UnitConverter/convert?uc_class=12&uc_value=2.2&uc_sigdigits=5&uc_unit=415&uc_cat=all&commit=Convert

  5. S.Gardia
    May 31, 2010 at 17:19 | #5

    That is a simple and good explanation.

    Fundamentals are very much needed in the market place.
    All vendors/pre-sales/consultants need a lot of basics to be understood. Appreciate your effort.

  6. deinoscloud
    October 14, 2010 at 13:30 | #6

    I wanted to post here a link to an awesome article from Scott Lowe about the very same subject… Worth a read and bookmark for future reference!

    http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/datacenter/?p=2182

  1. September 11, 2009 at 14:55 | #1
  2. December 7, 2009 at 17:39 | #2
  3. January 7, 2010 at 12:01 | #3
  4. October 30, 2010 at 16:42 | #4
  5. December 22, 2010 at 15:45 | #5
  6. December 30, 2011 at 13:59 | #6

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s