|Top 10 SSD OEMs – based on reader search volume in 3rd Quarter 2009 – © STORAGEsearch.com|
|rank||manufacturer||SSD technology||notes re this quarter…………………………………………….|
|1||Fusion-io||PCIe SSDs||Same as before.In July 2009 – Fusion-io announced the results of TPC-H benchmark tests sponsored by, and running on, Dell servers, and audited by Performance Metrics, Inc. The tested system achieved 28,772 QphH on a 100GB database, at a cost of $1.47 per database transaction. (The typical 3 year cost of ownership for the whole system including software is quoted as $41,998.)
In September 2009 – a historic milestone for the whole SSD industry was passed – when overall search volume for PCIe SSDs surpassed that for 2.5″ SSDs for the 1st time. That helped Fusion-io – which had already established for itself the iconic brand recognition of being the SSD company most strongly associated in customer minds with the PCIe form factor .That recognition is due as much to clever marketing as cleverly designed products and is despite the fact that Fusion-io wasn’t the 1st company to launch such a product – and also despite the growing high number and quality of competitors in this segment.Fusion-io’s search volume was more than 2x as high as the #4 ranked company in this list indicating overwhelmingly high reader affinity for learning more about this company.…
Later:- in October 2009 – Fusion-io published a case study showing how their ioDrive SSDs helped MySpace reduce server count, claim back 50% rack space while increasing application performance (compared to its legacy SAS RAID system) and massively decreasing electrical power.As a result of this initial project – MySpace plans to replace all remaining 1,770 2U servers with Fusion-io enabled servers as they reach their end-of-life.
|2||SandForce||flash SSD Controllers||Same as before.
In September 2009 – SMART Modular Technologies announced it has selected the SandForce SF-1500 SSD processor for use in its next-generation enterprise-class SATA SSDs sampling later this year.Everyone wants to be in the SSD market – and the growing number of flash SSD controller & IP companies is just 1 of the 3 factors breaking down the barriers to SSD market entry. SSD IP companies make it much easier for SSD oems to fill gaps in their product lines or freshen up tired old product ranges.But companies like SandForce also represent a potential threat to SSD makers who target the high volume oem market. That’s because high end server oems could tactically make their own brand SSDs once they have proved there is sufficient demand using merchant market SSD products.SandForce’s dual frenemmy nature may be a factor in the high interest levels in this company. Even if you’re not planning to use their products – you can’t afford to ignore them – because their technology may pop up in another place close to your own interests.…
Later:- in October 2009 – SandForce published a new article called – Data Integrity Challenges in flash SSD Design. It describes what’s needed inside the next generation of fast flash SSDs to ensure data integrity and to eliminate the risk of “silent errors.”
|Up 5 places since the last quarter
.In July 2009 – STEC announced it had received $120 million order for its ZeusIOPS SSDs from a single enterprise storage customer for delivery in the 2nd 1/2 of 2009. This followed an earlier announcement that the company has partnered with a leading defense systems contractor to supply its MACH8 industrial SSDs for integration into a platform designed on behalf of the U.S. Military as part of a 12 month, $28 million supply contract.
In August 2009 – STEC said it will ship 6Gb/s SAS flash SSDs in both 2.5″ and 3.5″ form factors in Q4. STEC’s new ZeusIOPS SSDs will deliver 80,000 IOPS random read, 40,000 IOPS random write with transfer speeds of 550MB/s read and 300MB/s write. STEC also said it’s sampling a faster version of its 3.5″ FC compatible SSDs. STEC also announced a new policy of offering MLC flash in so called “enterprise class SSDs”.Over many years STEC has earned a good reputation for shipping boringly reliable, high-quality fast SSDs which its oem customers can install and forget.As the performance gap between STEC and rivals has narrowed I would have expected it to become vulnerable to its customers switching away to lower priced products. Instead – STEC has been gaining from all the bad news stories in the industry about badly designed and inadequately validated SSD products shipped by other companies.Each time an oem customer sees another flaky flash SSD news story – that’s another reason to worry about the dangers of using nouvelle SSDs. And that is reinforced by the growing awareness that many engineers can’t even rely on their own benchmarks to filter and shortlist products they can depend on in real applications.These growing uncertainties mean that STEC may not have to worry unduly about Pliant Technology’s long anticapted foray into SAS flash SSD turf.…
Later:- in November 2009 – STEC disclosed that its biggest customer, EMC, hasn’t sold as many of its SSDs as expected – and will carry inventory into 2010. If this was a surprise to anyone it’s only because they didn’t read my analysis (published April 1, 2009) which appeared in the 8th quarterly edition of the top 10 SSD oems.
|4||Samsung||Notebook SSDs||Down 1 place since the last quarter.
In August 2009 – Samsung Electronics announced it is targeting the PC gaming industry with its 256GB SSD. This seemed to confirm the consumer-led focus of the company’s business strategy.Earlier StorageSearch.com had said it doesn’t think Samsung’s SSD product marketing is good enough to achieve success in the enterprise server market. Not everyone agrees with that because in September 2009 – Samsung announced that HP was offering its SSDs as an option in ProLiant servers.
Also in September 2009 – Samsung announced it has begun producing 512Mb PRAM memory. PRAM combines the speed of RAM for processing functions with the non-volatile characteristics of flash memory for storage. This has been a Problematic (rather than a Perfect) RAM technology. Samsung originally announced a working prototype of the 512Mb PRAM 3 years earlier – in September 2006.…
|5||WD Solid State Storage||SLC Flash SSDs||Up 5 places since the last quarter.This is the highest rank which WD has achieved in these tables and is 2 places higher than the previous best for SiliconSystems – which WD acquired in March 2009. This indicates a positive market reaction to the strongly rebranded SiliconDrive product family.|
|6||Texas Memory Systems||Rackmount SSDs
|Down 2 places since the last quarter.
In August 2009 – Texas Memory Systems launched the RamSan-6200 a 40U rackmount SSD with 100TB of SLC flash storage, 5 million IOPS performance and upto 60GB/s throughput – which uses approximately 6kW of power. It’s a scaled up system that combines 20x RamSan-620s in a single datacenter rack and uses TMS’ TeraWatch software to provide unified management and monitoring from a single GUI console.
In September 2009 – Texas Memory Systems expanded its IP base with the acquisition of data management patents and source code from Incipient. This technology acquisition will allow TMS to further differentiate its RamSan line of solid state storage solutions. Incipient developed scalable storage virtualisation and management capabilities over a period of 8 years. During that time, the company made significant technological advances and was awarded multiple patents.Although other rackmount SSD oems have appeared in the top 10 lists from time to time – TMS is the only one which has consistently made an appearance in every edition.I’ve tracked the company’s solid state storage products for nearly 20 years, but they’ve been in the SSD market even longer than that. Maybe it’s because of their longevity and endurance (no pun intended) they are regarded as being the “safe” choice for many high end conservative SSD buyers – in the same way that STEC is the “safe” (albeit expensive) choice in the small form factor SSD market.Both companies have an intense focus on the duality of SSD performance and reliability. And yet both have the ability to surprise the market and analysts from time to time with new innovative products that push back the frontiers….
Later:- in October 2009 – Texas Memory Systems announced that its RamSan-620 – (2U 5TB SLC flash SSD, price $220,000 approx) – has achieved a record setting SPC-1 result. It produced 254,994.21 SPC-1 IOPS with average response time of 0.72mS and at a cost of only $1.13 per SPC-1 IOPS – which is better than any competing RAID or Flash solution.
|First appearance in these top 10 tables.
In July 2009 – Foremay announced a new 1.8″ SLC flash SSD. The SATA compatible SC 199 Cheetah has sustained R/W speeds of 250MB/s and 220MB/s respectively. R/W IOPS are 6,000 and 5,200 respectively. Capacity options range from 16GB to 64GB. Endurance for the 16GB device is rated at 87 years assuming 50GB sequential writes per day
.In September 2009 – Foremay announced the SC199 Hi-Rel Series SLC flash SSDs in 1.8″, 2.5″ and 3.5″ form factors which meet military standards MIL-STD-810G and MIL-STD-833G. Operational temperature options include -40°C to approx 100°C.…
Later:- in October 2009 – Foremay entered the PCIe SSD market with its EC188 Dragon series – which is now sampling. R/W performance is upto 1.5 GB/s and 1.3 GB/s respectively. Both MLC and SLC models are available. Capacities range from 128GB to 4TB. Random R/W IOPS is up to 27,000/12,000.
In November 2009 – Foremay announced it is shipping the world’s fastest 2.5″ SATA flash SSDs. The SC199 Cheetah Y-Series has R/W speeds up to 290/280 MB/s in 2.5″ and 3.5″ SATA form factors – which approaches the theoretical speed limit of the SATA-II protocol. It also delivers impressive R/W IOPS of up to 50,000/45,000 respectively.
|8||SanDisk||MLC Flash SSDs||Down 2 places since the last quarter.SanDisk which had reported a 10% year on year revenue decline for the previous quarter was more – talked about by SSD analysts – than talking itself about the SSD market – in this quarter.|
|9||RunCore||Flash SSDs||Down 4 places since the last quarter.
In September 2009 – RunCore, which has 20 patents in China, and a strong background with the defense market in the PRC, launched a family of military SSDs with -55°C to +125°C operation as well as an enhanced range of industrial 2.5″ SSDs.
|10||Intel||2.5″ SSDs||Reappearance in these top 10 tables.Companies can get high visibility for negative as well as positive reasons. This was, alas, the case for Intel – which in a mixed good-news / bad-news quarter joined the notorious band of companies having once shipped flaky SSDs.
In July 2009 – Intel announced a process shrink for its X25-M – SATA 2.5″ MLC flash SSD. The new 34nm devices deliver upto 8,800 (4KB) write IOPS and up to 35,000 read IOPS. R/W speeds are 250MB/s and 70MB/s respectively. R/W latenciy is 65µS and 85µS. The 160GB model is priced at $440 (1,000 unit price point).But within days of announcing the new Intel SSDs – shipments were suspended due to an internal bug.That was one reason – cited by Pillar Data Systems in this quarter – for publicly dumping Intel SSDs and switching to STEC.
Later:- in October 2009 – Intel joined the growing roster of SSD companies who have announced support for Trim functions. These benefit flash SSDs which don’t have internal fast active garbage collection. The company recommends users install the firmware update and toolbox, and run the Trim function daily to ensure best performance.
- RT @lufthansaNews: Premiere in our #A380 cockpit: First Lufthansa A380 flight with 3 female pilots coming back from their HKG tour this mor… 2 days ago
- @eck79 Very important management wise ... thx Adam ;) 4 days ago
- #askingforafriend pro’s and con’s of having a VMW Horizon dedicated vCenter server joining a shared (as opposed to dedicated) PSC #vExpert 4 days ago
- RT @helengreiner: Why Interstellar Travel Will Be Possible Sooner Than You Think singularityhub.com/2017/06/18/why… 6 days ago
- Following-up "12 'best practices' IT should avoid at all costs" published @CIO here is my stance -> linkedin.com/pulse/12-best-… 1 week ago
How To Troubleshoot… on Chunk Size Of a RAID0 Volume O… PiroNet on It All Started With This … Gorka on It All Started With This … An administrator not… on Ballooning And Hypervisor Swap… revate on Installing Oracle Database Cli…
Views expressed here are mine, they are not read or approved in advance by any company and don’t reflect the views of my employer, my employer’s business partners, or clients. I am solely responsible for all content produced here. No information provided here was reviewed by or endorsed by my employer or any other vendor or organization. This is my own blog. Comments are moderated!